Lead from the middle
Q I am an influential VP who pushes agendas forward and gets results. I would bring huge value to the executive team, but the CEO says I come on too strong and need to “tone down” first. That’s not my style. Why should I change?
A You are confident and competent at leading from the front. Rather than perceiving the feedback as a need to change, what if it is an invitation to expand your leadership range? How skilled are you at leading from the middle and the back?
Leading peers requires different skills than leading directs. It involves relinquishing control, responsibility and ownership; collaborating, supporting and championing another’s ideas; being curious rather than convincing; listening, questioning and guiding other’s initiatives. Using their influence to persuade others align to the goal and obtain necessary resources to ensure its success.
When leading in the middle, the leader resists jumping in even if they know the answer.
They are not the dominant player. Instead they create a climate of openness and trust by encouraging all viewpoints, soliciting input and active involvement in decision making.
They point out the value in others opinions, facilitate debate, guide conversations rather than take a position. They ask rather than tell.
When leading from behind, the objective is to stay out of the limelight so others receive recognition for the work.
Ensure everyone works together collaboratively, only contributing strengths where there are deficits.
Effective inspiring leaders are adaptive and can accurately access which style is best suited for the situation to achieve results effectively while maintaining strong working relationships. They are able to hand over the steering wheel – becoming a gracious passenger, not a back seat driver.
Originally printed inĀ The Province, June 16, 2013.
Comments
Got something to say?